Best Seat in the House: Make the Overlooked Object Worth Looking At

Read the campaign story

A toilet seat enters the frame as an art object. WaterAid and Rankin Agency’s November 2021 Best Seat in the House collaboration invited artists and designers to transform seats and photographed the collection. A September 2024 announcement returned the collection to attention through an auction at the British Art Fair. The later sale invitation belongs to the same creative family; it is not counted as a new platform.

Editorial interpretation: the object’s low status is part of the idea. Treating it as worthy of close attention creates a small reversal before any explanation begins. Yet the decorative transformation has two possible destinations: it can make the underlying function newly noticeable, or it can become an entertaining curiosity detached from the reason for showing it. The creative task is to maintain the link between what is surprising in the presentation and what is important in ordinary use. The artwork opens the conversation; it cannot be expected to complete the explanation on its own.

The charity’s two primary announcements establish the collaboration, collection and later planned auction. They do not verify completed sale proceeds or the resulting service impact. Health statistics, matching-fund terms and individual quotations are not reproduced here. No image inspection, film viewing or artwork ownership is claimed. This study does not recommend altering sanitary equipment or make a clinical claim. The proposed exercise uses an original paper illustration of a different everyday object and involves no donation, sale or installation.

Choose an object whose function explains its relevance

For a fictional neighbourhood lending service, an illustrated luggage tag could stand for the often-overlooked task of identifying and returning borrowed objects. Its connection should be understandable without a long explanation. A random spectacular item might attract more attention but would require the audience to invent the relationship. Write down what the ordinary object enables before proposing its unusual treatment. If the creative transformation removes the very feature that makes the function recognizable, it may have traded useful meaning for a stronger first impression.

Give the maker a clear contribution

In the invented exercise, commission an adult illustrator to create an original oversized paper version of the tag. Credit the illustrator for the design rather than presenting the work as something the service produced alone. Keep the treatment distinct from the service explanation so neither role becomes ambiguous. The maker can interpret the object, while the operator remains responsible for the factual description of borrowing and returns. A collaboration is stronger when the audience understands what each contributor brought, not merely that several names appear together.

Test whether attention returns to the ordinary job

The fictional lending service should show the illustration alongside a short account of how items are identified, collected and returned. Ask viewers what the object helps the service do before asking whether they like the design. A visually memorable treatment that leaves the function obscure has answered only one part of the brief. Equally, a practical explanation that makes the art unnecessary may reveal that the proposed collaboration adds little. Compare both understanding and attention without assuming either is a proxy for the other.

A small test for another brief

Proposed adaptation: build two paper information panels for the fictional lending service. Both explain the same invented return process; one uses a plain tag illustration and the other uses the commissioned expressive version. Ask consenting adults to describe the function, identify the maker’s contribution and explain the offered next step. Use no charity assets or functional equipment. The review examines whether the surprising treatment helps people notice a useful role without allowing the design to become a disconnected attraction.

Compare correct explanations and mistaken inferences as well as recall. Liking the image does not establish understanding, actual borrowing, fundraising or the historical campaign’s sanitation impact. Record those boundaries in the review rather than combining them into one success label.

Revise if reviewers remember only the novelty, mistake the illustrated object for an approved product or infer an outcome the service cannot substantiate. An unusual presentation should make the underlying purpose more legible, not replace it.

• Name the object’s ordinary contribution.
• Credit the maker’s specific interpretation.
• Keep the function visible beside the transformation.