← Reading listWHERE WORK HAPPENS: EXPLAIN AN INVISIBLE SERVICE THROUGH EVERYDAY ACTIVITY
Text

DEEPER STUDY / Slack / 2017

Where Work Happens: Explain an Invisible Service Through Everyday Activity

Illustrated workplace activity gave an intangible collaboration service a recognisable human setting across outdoor and magazine advertising.

Workplace softwareUnited States6 min read
Published by SNS Media Tech

AI-assisted research and analysis for the SNS Creative Fieldbook. No named human reviewer is claimed.

Sources reviewed 7 November 2026

Original creators did not write or endorse this analysis.

Original campaign credits: Gold Front; illustrations by South African collective Radio. The launch account names Josh Lowman as Gold Front founder and creative director, Evan Winchester for copy, Denise Knickerbocker for art buying, and Jenny Taich and Devin McNulty as producers.
Recognition: No award claim is made in this study.
Launch / edition: 2017. Award years: No award claim.

The problem. The idea. The experience.

Explain an intangible workplace service.

How the idea came to life

Illustrated scenes of people and activities.

How it reached people

Outdoor and national magazine placements.

Read the data in context.

The numbers below describe different kinds of outcomes. Their date, scope and reporting source are part of the result.

No independent causal outcome claimed.

Read the campaign story

Gold Front’s Where Work Happens campaign for Slack was documented in January 2017. Illustrated by Radio, it appeared in six US cities alongside national magazine placements. The agency’s own portfolio describes a human-centred message carried through outdoor and print. The campaign is treated as one family across placements rather than a separate study for each city or illustration.

This is distinct from the earlier So Yeah, We Tried Slack testimonial already in the library. Here the subject is an illustrated category-positioning system for an audience encountering the service outside a product demonstration. Launch commentary about engagement and productivity is an agency claim, not independent causal evidence. Historical feature references are not presented as a current account of available plans, integrations or capabilities.

Editorial interpretation: software often performs work that is difficult to photograph or explain in a few seconds. Scenes of people, tasks and interactions can give that invisible activity a recognisable shape. Illustration also permits a consistent visual language across very different formats. The strategic question is whether the audience learns what the service helps people do, rather than simply noticing an appealing depiction of office life.

Editorial interpretation: an expansive category line can accommodate many uses, but it can become vague if every workplace activity appears equally supported. A short advertisement needs a deliberate division of labour with the destination page. The first layer can establish relevance; the next must explain functions, conditions and limitations. A human tone is valuable when it helps people understand the service, not when it substitutes friendliness for a precise proposition.

Choose an everyday activity that reveals the category

Begin with a recognisable task rather than an abstract noun such as collaboration or productivity. Identify the information people exchange and the result they are trying to reach. The scene does not need to portray every feature, but it should contain a credible link to the service. Test whether an unfamiliar viewer can describe the category in their own words. If they only describe the illustration, add a clearer functional cue instead of more decorative detail.

Design a visual system that survives different viewing conditions

Outdoor, magazine and small digital formats offer different amounts of time and space. Preserve a clear hierarchy rather than shrinking the same elaborate scene into every placement. Provide accessible text equivalents and avoid making colour the only way to identify roles or actions. A small team can test a few original illustrations at realistic sizes before commissioning a large set. Consistency should make recognition easier without forcing every format to carry the same density of information.

Let the next layer answer the practical questions

A broad promise should lead to a direct explanation of what is included, who it suits and what remains outside its scope. Do not let an engaging scene imply that a tool replaces judgement, accountability or every existing workflow. Review the transition from advertisement to product information as one experience. The audience should not have to restart its understanding because the destination uses unrelated terminology or presents a different proposition from the one that attracted attention.

A small test for another brief

Proposed adaptation: a fictional adult volunteer club could compare a plain description of an event-planning board with three original illustrated task scenes. Both versions would lead to the same static explanation of a limited scheduling function. Use synthetic names and dates, no live accounts or private messages, and do not copy Slack’s visual style, logo or interface. The exercise tests category understanding rather than tool adoption.

Measure correct category identification, comprehension of the limited function and continuity between the two information layers. Separate visual appeal from assumptions about productivity, security or suitability for a real organisation.

Stop if the scene implies unsupported functions, exposes real workplace information or leaves viewers less able to explain the offer than the plain description.

  • Create accessible matched layouts at poster and phone-screen sizes.
  • Show one concrete task and clearly state which decisions the people still make.
  • Ask unfamiliar adults to explain the service before and after reading the detailed page.

Sources & further reading.

Source-backed campaign details, original editorial interpretation and proposed tests are distinguished. Partner and award-entry reports are not independent causal audits.