← Reading listGOOD VIBES
Text

CASE 31 / Samsung / 2019

Good Vibes

Make inclusion usable, then communicate the service around it.

Published by SNS Media Tech

AI-assisted research and analysis for the SNS Creative Fieldbook

Sources reviewed 2026-11-05

Campaign credits belong to the original creators. They did not write or endorse this analysis.

Technology & accessibilityIndia4 min read

Credits: Cheil India / Gurugram and Samsung Electronics India / Gurugram.
Recognition: 2020 One Show Merit, Innovation in Health & Wellness.
Launch / edition: 2019. Award years: 2020.

The problem. The idea. The experience.

Samsung addressed communication barriers faced by deafblind people and their communication partners.

How the idea came to life

Good Vibes translated text or voice into Morse-code haptics and supported tactile responses through a paired interface.

How it reached people

A digital campaign and training workshops accompanied the app. Samsung’s September 2019 story included an explanatory film.

Read the data in context.

The numbers below describe different kinds of outcomes. Their date, scope and reporting source are part of the result.

The 2020 award entry reports more than 20,812 downloads. It does not establish active usage, successful conversations or long-term accessibility outcomes.

The creative mechanism.

A functioning tool supported by training and explanatory storytelling

Both sides of the interaction need design

An accessible tool fails if only one participant can operate it. Consider the complete exchange and the support required for each person, not just the interface that looks innovative.

Training is part of distribution

Availability in a store is not equivalent to usability. For unfamiliar interaction patterns, demonstrations, onboarding and ongoing support are part of the product proposition.

The intended behavior loop

  1. 01Learn what the tool enables
  2. 02Receive suitable training
  3. 03Complete a useful exchange
  4. 04Return when the tool solves a real communication need

Growth job: Accessibility utility → adoption → brand trust. This is an interpretation of the mechanism, not an audited attribution model.

A direction to take into the room.

Original editorial interpretation and proposed adaptation. This is a proposed adaptation, not historical campaign execution or a forecast.

The transferable principle

Treat an overlooked access barrier as a product brief and co-design with affected users before publicizing the idea.

Keep these boundaries

Do not present disabled people as props for a technology reveal. Include accessibility specialists, consent and realistic information about training and limitations.

Turn the lesson into a test.

Illustrative adaptation, not a historical campaign fact

A small-team experiment

A local service pilots one accessible appointment workflow with paid participants and communication partners.

Build the test

  1. Map the complete interaction with users.
  2. Prototype one practical improvement.
  3. Test task success and support needs before promotion.

Measure the right thing

Measure successful task completion, errors, repeat use and user-reported autonomy.

Know when to stop

Stop or redesign if the workflow excludes intended users or requires more help than the existing process.

How this reading fits your brief

Start with the useful part.

Best for: Accessibility utility → adoption → brand trust

What to adapt: Treat an overlooked access barrier as a product brief and co-design with affected users before publicizing the idea.

Prerequisites: Co-design; Accessibility expertise; Ongoing support.

Smaller-team route: Test the underlying mechanism at a small scale; do not assume the original reach, rights or economics are available.

Budget: Not established by the cited public sources. No cost-fit claim is made.

Trade-offs and evidence: Read the limits below before choosing a test. There is no guaranteed reach, sales lift or ROAS.

Questions for your next brief

  1. What is the smallest observable action that would advance this job: accessibility utility → adoption → brand trust?
  2. What would a fair comparison show that views and applause cannot?

Sources & further reading.

Brand and award-entry results are attributed claims, not independent causal audits. Source links open the original third-party pages.

Independent educational analysis of external campaigns. These are not SNS client projects, endorsements or claims of involvement. Campaign facts and reported outcomes are attributed to their sources. Explanations, adaptations and test plans are original analysis and hypotheses, not proven causal findings.