DEEPER STUDY / Dulux / AkzoNobel / 2010
Let’s Colour: the 2010 community-painting launch
make real product use create a locally useful change, then let that change generate the communication.
AI-assisted research and analysis for the SNS Creative Fieldbook
Sources reviewed 6 November 2026
The original campaign creators did not write or endorse this analysis.
Original campaign credits: Agency: Euro RSCG London; Director: Adam Berg; Production: Stink.
Recognition: No award claim is made in this study.
Launch / edition: 2010. Award years: No award claim.
The problem. The idea. The experience.
Make the promise of bringing colour into people’s lives tangible.
How the idea came to life
Community painting projects documented for a campaign film.
How it reached people
Online film, television and supporting documentary/social material.
Supporting sources: contemporary design coverage → campaign archive →
Read the data in context.
The numbers below describe different kinds of outcomes. Their date, scope and reporting source are part of the result.
Execution verified; independent community impact and isolated sales effects not established.
Read the campaign story
Dulux’s Let’s Colour turned the act of applying paint into the subject of a global campaign in 2010. Contemporary May coverage describes community painting events in the United Kingdom, France, Brazil and India, filmed for a launch advertisement directed by Adam Berg. Euro RSCG London and production company Stink made the campaign. Its material was the transformation of actual places, rather than a studio room constructed only for advertising.
The campaign’s One Club archive explains the intended connection: demonstrate the brand’s promise through work undertaken with local communities, then assemble that activity into a film. Contemporary coverage records an online release followed by television, alongside documentary and social material. The archive is dated 2011, but the launch belongs to 2010. This case does not treat later worldwide community programmes as results of the original film.
Editorial reading: Paint normally disappears into the finished surface. Here the process becomes visible and social. People, preparation and collective work give the final colour a narrative. The product is not merely placed beside a good cause; using it is the action that creates the story. That connection can make a purpose-led message more concrete, provided the work is useful to the people who live with the result.
The important distinction is between documenting an activity and arranging an activity solely to obtain attractive footage. Residents may care about durability, maintenance, access and the choice of colour more than the campaign’s visual consistency. A credible adaptation would let those needs determine the project. The production schedule should follow the work, not force a community to behave like a cast assembled for the brand.
This structure also changes how content can be planned. The main film shows the transformation; shorter pieces can explain a resident’s choice, a practical technique or the maintenance plan. Each version should answer a different question. Repeating the same celebratory montage across every channel would miss the chance to make the project understandable and useful to audiences with different levels of interest.
For a small team, one agreed improvement is enough to test the idea. Record the starting problem, the decisions made with the site’s users and what remains after filming. Evaluate satisfaction and continued usefulness before celebrating reach. The opened sources do not establish independently measured neighbourhood benefits or causal sales lift, so the responsible lesson is about aligning product use with a visible contribution, not claiming that paint alone resolves wider social problems.
Agree the improvement before filming
Let the people who use the place define the problem, permissions, finish and maintenance requirements.
Give each content piece a job
Separate the transformation story from practical guidance, resident choices and follow-up evidence.
Measure what remains
Check whether the improvement is still useful after the camera crew leaves, rather than substituting video reach for community value.
A small test for another brief
Document a permissioned, community-selected improvement using the product.
Track user satisfaction, maintenance needs and qualified enquiries separately from viewing figures.
Stop if the filming compromises consent, local priorities, safe application or long-term upkeep.
- Agree one useful project with the site owner and its users.
- Document decisions and application with explicit filming permission.
- Leave a maintenance plan and return to check the result.
Sources & further reading.
These are educational analyses of external campaigns, not SNS client projects. Source-backed campaign details, editorial interpretation and proposed tests are distinguished. Brand and campaign-entry reports are not independent causal audits.
- Fired By Design: World of colour →contemporary design coverage · Supports: 24 May 2010 account, initial four-country events, film rollout and production credits.
- The One Club: Dulux Let’s Colour Project →campaign archive · Supports: Community-based production premise and online-film launch; archive year 2011 is distinct from execution year.