← Reading listRECYCLE ME: THE CRUSHED LOGO
Text

DEEPER STUDY / Coca-Cola / 2024

Recycle Me: The Crushed Logo

Let a recognisable brand asset visibly undergo the action the communication asks people to consider.

BeveragesLatin America launch including Brazil, Argentina and Mexico5 min read
Published by SNS Media Tech

AI-assisted research and analysis for the SNS Creative Fieldbook

Sources reviewed 7 November 2026

The original campaign creators did not write or endorse this analysis.

Original campaign credits: WPP Open X, led by Ogilvy New York, for The Coca-Cola Company.
Recognition: No award-level claim is made in this study; linked award archives also document execution and credits.
Launch / edition: 2024. Award years: No award claim.

The problem. The idea. The experience.

Recycling reminders can become invisible when they resemble routine packaging instructions.

How the idea came to life

Images of logos distorted by physically crushed cans were used with a short recycling invitation.

How it reached people

Outdoor, print and social creative, initially documented in Latin America.

Read the data in context.

The numbers below describe different kinds of outcomes. Their date, scope and reporting source are part of the result.

Sources establish the creative process and launch geography; no change in collection or recycling rates is established.

Read the campaign story

Coca-Cola’s Recycle Me appeared in 2024 with unusually distorted versions of its familiar identity. WPP Open X, led by Ogilvy New York, used actual crushed cans to produce the altered logos. Ogilvy describes mechanical techniques including presses and vacuums. The visual result borrowed the recognisability of a carefully managed brand mark, then showed that mark after the package had been compressed.

Contemporary April coverage identifies Brazil, Argentina and Mexico among the initial markets and describes outdoor, print and social distribution. This is distinct from other Coca-Cola recycling messages or recycled-plastic packaging programmes sharing similar wording. The sources establish a communication idea, not verified environmental improvement. The campaign is therefore analysed here as a visual reminder, without treating broader corporate ambitions as completed results.

Editorial interpretation: the picture gives the call to action a consequence. Instead of placing an untouched logo beside an environmental statement, the brand allows the requested behaviour to alter its own most protected visual asset. Recognition survives the distortion, which is part of the demonstration. The audience can resolve the image quickly because it already knows the original. Less familiar brands would need to test whether the same treatment remains legible.

Editorial interpretation: this simplicity is both the strength and the limit. It can make recycling feel salient at the end of consumption, but it cannot explain collection infrastructure, material recovery or differing local instructions. The useful adaptation pairs a memorable image with a locally correct action. A team should resist turning a powerful visual metaphor into an unsupported claim that one disposal behaviour solves the full environmental impact of a product.

Give the identity a meaningful transformation

List the physical changes associated with the desired action and ask which one could alter a brand asset recognisably. The transformation should explain something rather than simply look unusual. Prototype in monochrome and at small sizes. If people identify the logo but cannot infer the intended action, the work is a styling exercise and needs a clearer instruction or context.

Separate symbolic clarity from practical accuracy

Review the action with local collection operators or qualified environmental specialists before publication. A universal visual does not guarantee a universal instruction. Provide market-specific guidance when systems differ, especially where container shape affects sorting or deposit returns. Accuracy should determine the execution even when a more dramatic treatment would produce a cleaner creative presentation.

Measure behaviour at the relevant point

Choose an observation that corresponds to the reminder, such as correct disposal into an available collection stream. Recall and liking are useful intermediate measures, not recovered material. Track contamination and mistaken disposal as well as participation. If the brand claims an environmental outcome, establish an auditable method and boundary instead of converting campaign reach into an assumed benefit.

A small test for another brief

Proposed test: a venue could compare two original signs for an existing collection point, one showing the material’s next accepted state and one using a conventional recycling instruction.

Compare correctly sorted items, contamination and questions received by staff. Check recognition in a short voluntary interview. Report the local observation only, without extrapolating a national environmental impact.

Stop if the image encourages an action incompatible with local recycling rules or causes confusion about accepted materials. Do not imply that packaging is harmless because a disposal route exists.

  • Confirm exactly what the venue’s collection provider accepts and how it should be presented.
  • Create accessible signs using the venue’s own identity, with identical practical instructions.
  • Rotate signs across matched periods and record counts without filming identifiable visitors.

Sources & further reading.

These are educational analyses of external campaigns, not SNS client projects. Source-backed campaign details, editorial interpretation and proposed tests are distinguished. Brand and campaign-entry reports are not independent causal audits.