The Ticket-Shoe: EQT Support 93/Berlin

Read the campaign story

In January 2018, Berlin’s transport operator BVG and adidas Originals put a familiar piece of public transport into a desirable object. Their sneaker used the pattern associated with BVG seating and incorporated a transit ticket. Contemporary Der Standard reporting announced the retail release, while BVG’s own follow-up confirms the sewn-in annual ticket and credits Jung von Matt/Saga for the idea and execution.

The collaboration was a limited product release, not a universal replacement for tickets. Its travel validity ended in 2018. The shoe therefore combined two distinct reasons to care: a recognisable local design and a real service benefit. Industry association GWA describes the brand objective as showing BVG’s connection to the city’s modern identity, extending beyond a merely humorous advertising voice.

Editorial reading: The seat fabric was an unusually useful asset because residents encountered it in everyday life. Moving the pattern from shared infrastructure to personal footwear changed its social meaning. Something people ordinarily sat on became something they could choose to wear. The campaign did not need to invent a new symbol of Berlin travel; it recontextualised one that already had local recognition.

The ticket made the collaboration more than a logo exchange. Both partners contributed a function: footwear and mobility. That gave the object an explanatory sentence simple enough for press coverage and conversation. A good partnership can often be tested this way. If the audience cannot explain what becomes possible when the partners combine, the collaboration may be relying mostly on borrowed fame.

Scarcity creates a caution. A limited collectible can attract attention without improving the ordinary passenger experience for everyone else. The release should not be treated as evidence that service reliability, accessibility or public satisfaction changed. Those require separate measures. A smaller organisation should also consider whether an exclusive item leaves its core users feeling included, indifferent or overlooked.

This case covers the original 2018 ticket-shoe and does not describe a current fare entitlement. The opened sources verify the design, partnership, release period and ticket function, not a causal ridership increase. The transferable principle is to join a recognisable local asset to a useful capability. Start with something the audience already knows, change where it belongs and make the new object genuinely do something that neither a decorative souvenir nor an ordinary advertisement could do alone.

Find an overlooked local asset

Look for patterns or objects people already associate with the organisation.

Give both partners a job

Combine complementary capabilities rather than placing two logos on the same item.

Separate collectible attention from service outcomes

Measure the partnership’s effect without claiming it fixes the underlying public service.

A small test for another brief

Combine a recognised local design asset with a modest service benefit.

Measure recognition, benefit comprehension and actual redemption.

Stop if the benefit cannot be honoured or the object implies wider access than it provides.

• Choose an asset that residents already recognise.
• Agree a real, clearly bounded benefit with a partner.
• Prototype and test whether people understand both contributions.